Comments
flabberghaster wrote
I agree with you but it wouldn't make a very good shitpost. That's a legit position and I couldn't then joke around about it.
hollyhoppet wrote
oh i honestly thought you were referencing how texas basically was taken from mexico through conquest lol
flabberghaster wrote
I was, Texas by settlers who wanted to introduce slavery and California was taken as part of the treaty to end the Mexican American war.
But I was thinking a hypothetical Mexican Revanchist position is so fringe and silly that it could be joked about, while Land Back is serious and should be done.
anethum wrote
mex-mex cuisine
oolong wrote
where does that leave new mexico?
flabberghaster wrote
They should take it or not, up to them. Same as Arizona. Freebies, but not required.
oolong wrote
los estados unidos mexicanos welcomes new mexico as a state!
Dogmantra wrote
Mexico's had California and Texas before, I think they ought to enjoy some novelty and take Michigan instead.
hollyhoppet wrote
i think soverienty of all parts of north and south america should just be given back to their original owners tbh, for those of them that are still alive (which is more than you probably think!)